[Publib] Architecture AL Issue
Michael Golrick
mgolrick at SLOL.LIB.LA.US
Fri May 8 11:42:15 EDT 2009
But, you *can* have attractive spaces that are workable! I have seen
many. I hope to visit the Darien Library which I expect to be both.
Sue Kamm makes a great point about the architect spending time in a
building before planning a renovation or new facility. In addition to
the atrocity (loved by architects) in Seattle, I remember hearing that
in the "new" Phoenix (AZ) main library, they had to go and add barriers
to keep people from falling into the "pool" in the lobby. For those who
were at PLA in Minneapolis, if you saw that building, I will admit that
the first time I was there, I was on an upper floor in a meeting room,
but could not figure out how to get into the library part! (You can only
enter at the main level.) At least that atrium is glassed off from the
library to avoid the kinds of problems which Sue noted in her facility.
I have been trying to think of new (not renovated or re-purposed)
facilities I have visited which are both attractive and functional, most
of them are smaller libraries in Connecticut - like the Jonathan
Trumbull Library in Lebanon. I would even point to the North Branch of
the Bridgeport (CT) Public Library. [Disclaimer - I was not there when
it was designed and built, but lived in the community and eventually was
the director there.]
And I respectfully disagree about people in library photos, but that is
also a matter of taste.
Michael A. Golrick
michael.golrick at gmail.com
ALA Councilor-at-Large
________________________________
From: publib-bounces at webjunction.org
[mailto:publib-bounces at webjunction.org] On Behalf Of Steve Benson
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 10:19 AM
To: publib at webjunction.org
Subject: Re: [Publib] Architecture AL Issue
I'm all for practicality but hate to encourage libraries to be bogged
down with boring, boxy buildings. Do we really want our buildings to
mimic the librarian stereotype of the lady with a bun, practical dress
and shoes? Beauty in buildings may add impracticality but it can also
add inspiration to all who pass by or enter. Isn't inspiration
something that we aspire to?
No people in the photographs presenting new buildings? What's the fuss?
Anyone who has sold a home knows that you clean and arrange your home in
a fashion that's nothing like how you normally keep it. You're selling
a house and preparing a salable image rather than presenting YOUR normal
life to potential buyers. Same with the building shots. The
photographers are capturing the building and disorder, people and
things, only draw your attention away from the true subject of the
photograph.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.webjunction.org/wjlists/publib/attachments/20090508/2fd25496/attachment.htm
More information about the Publib
mailing list