[Publib] Reading Recycled Books
Backwage at aol.com
Backwage at aol.com
Mon Mar 2 09:07:46 EST 2009
First, Oliver Sacks. Did you know that his Anthropologist on Mars has a
glow-in-the-dark jacket? I didn't, until I turned out the lights last night.
Next, the lesser Brontes. You're a sick person if you've read them, and
need help. I spent four years of the navy with those girls, and I know. I
slept with each of them in turn, but you had to be quick because they tended to
die on you. Friends shunned me. Librarians clawed my flesh when I left port
with too many volumes. I hid Agnes Grey in a book jacket from Shane and
per-tended to be a regular guy.
The argument (perhaps in the operatic sense) is that it is just easier, much
quicker for me to satisfy my sick need for certain elevated books via the
dollar outlet rather than browsing/clicking/inquiring at the library. It just
is. For that matter, I have found many more personally suitable books that
were library discards than were on the shelves of my local library. Of
course, this reflects my own rather narrow tastes. My desire is to have some
portion of them narrow tastes satisfied in a manner which the library doesn't do
now.
Another thing: project Gutenberg is also much more better for finding old
desirable stuff than the library. I just sit down and look. And the Google
Scholar feature for finding articles. And I write this as a general dis-liker
of computer literature. You see, it isn't that I don't like the library,
it's that I have to be honest. Not being honest is why the library is losing
its intellectual base and heritage and (to use an apt but dated term) its
birthright.
The library is engaged in a game of catch-up with technology and with the
delivery speed of its competitors. There didn't use to be any competitors.
Just ask the little old corner bookstore what that means--if you can find one
that's still open. The difference between most public library systems and the
corner bookstore is that the library has a buffer of funding which tends to
perpetuate some of its anachronistic features. Me, I'm an anachronistic
reader but want speed in the finding and the getting. And also in the keeping,
at least for a while. Any solutions for that?
Finally: I write research papers these days on a variety of topics and
never visit the library anymore. That alarms me. The documentation is superior
to what I used to be able to obtain from visiting, say, L.A. Central. I am
assisting in a couple of college courses whose students also do not cross the
portals of their university library, though their papers cite adequately.
Raises the hair on my neck.
M. McGrorty
**************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy
steps!
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1218822736x1201267884/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fwww.freecreditreport.com%2Fpm%2Fdefault.aspx%3Fsc%3D668072%26hmpgID
%3D62%26bcd%3DfebemailfooterNO62)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.webjunction.org/wjlists/publib/attachments/20090302/2032796a/attachment.htm
More information about the Publib
mailing list