[Publib] Advance[d] Reading Copies
Victoria Kemp
victoria.kemp at flower-mound.com
Mon Sep 29 11:51:31 EDT 2008
As a book seller in my former life, Lesley is absolutely correct. It is
cheating the author to add these books to your collection. And, as a
further footnote, when they say "don't sell this," please honor the
publisher and author's instructions and do not put them in your
library's book sale. If you think there is a dearth of mid-list authors
now, you are directly contributing to this dearth by adding these books
to your collection and not letting the publishers know (by your book
purchase) you think mid-list book are just as important as books that
are as well marketed as James Patterson, Patricia Cornwell and Danielle
Steel.
FWIW
Viccy Kemp
The opinions are my own; the library wouldn't want 'em!
________________________________
From: publib-bounces at webjunction.org
[mailto:publib-bounces at webjunction.org] On Behalf Of Knieriem, Lesley
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 10:43 AM
To: publib at webjunction.org
Subject: RE: [Publib] Advance[d] Reading Copies
I receive dozens of fiction ARCs every year, and never in my memory have
they been "copies of the first edition." They are unedited, rife with
typos, missing materials, and poorly bound. Adding them to the
collection would be deceiving your patrons and stealing from the author
and publisher of the works. It is the equivalent of paying for a ticket
to see a movie at your local theatre, and instead of being shown the
finished product, only being allowed to see the uncut, unedited
compiliation of daily rushes. Wouldn't you feel cheated? And if the
book is worthy of being added to your collection, don't the author and
publisher deserve fair recompense?
(And no book added to the collection is really "free" - generally
speaking, the cost of processing, handling, cataloging, and shelving
even a donated item is equivalent to the discounted purchase price of a
properly acquired new book. We owe it to our taxpayers to make sure
this money is spent on the best possible materials.)
As for what I do with all those ARCs - why, I use them for the intended
purpose. After I finish marking them up for review, I pass them along
to others - patrons and librarians - for the purpose of review and
creating advance buzz. If no one is interested (a useful bit of data in
itself) I throw them away.
Lesley Knieriem
Rogers Public Library
Rogers AR
________________________________
From: Judith Turner [mailto:turnermalibmba at yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 9:30 PM
To: publib at webjunction.org
Subject: RE: [Publib] Advance[d] Reading Copies
My question is why don't you add advance reading copies (aka review
copies) to the library collection, assuming the book is one you would
acquire anyway? Nowadays, they are copies of the first edition that are
released early for publicity purposes so it's not a cataloging problem,
except possibly in science-fiction where collectors consider them as the
real first editions.
________________________________
The Information contained in this e-mail is confidential and is intended
only for the named recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient,
you must not copy, distribute or take any action or reliance on it. If
you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender. Any
unauthorized disclosure of the information contained in this e-mail is
strictly prohibited. The views and opinions expressed in this e-mail are
the sender's own and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions
of the City of Rogers.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.webjunction.org/wjlists/publib/attachments/20080929/3701b90b/attachment.htm
More information about the Publib
mailing list