[Publib] Re: Powering off computer gear at night

[Andrea Berstler]

If you are doing this as a "scientific" survey, you would have to add in the
cost of cooling a room or building full of electronic equipment during the
night as well. Those things put off a nice amount of heat. (a good thing in
the winter). . .

-----Original Message-----
From: publib-bounces at webjunction.org
[mailto:publib-bounces at webjunction.org]On Behalf Of Hopkins County -
Madisonville Public Library
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 1:43 PM
To: publib at webjunction.org
Subject: RE: [Publib] Re: Powering off computer gear at night


I turn all of our systems off at night (there are only about 20 in the
entire building), with the exception of the servers & the storyline system.
All of the staff systems get switched off as well. The only issues I have
had have been a couple of power switches break, but that's been in over 2
years. With the limited budget we have, we have to watch all the pennies.
One thing I heard that I wouldn't mind getting some clarification on is
whether it is advisable to turn off copiers overnight, or let them sit on
standby.

Terry Caudle
Hopkins County - Madisonville Public Library
library at vci.net
www.publiclibrary.org


-----Original Message-----
From: publib-bounces at webjunction.org [mailto:publib-bounces at webjunction.org]
On Behalf Of Joe Schallan
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 12:24 PM
To: Publib Publib Discussion
Subject: [Publib] Re: Powering off computer gear at night

Reed Winterbourne wrote:

"I wonder if the energy use costs that your library could incur by
leaving
the computers running throughout the night has been considered. At my
library the computers and monitors used by both the public and the
staff are
powered down after hours to conserve energy."

This reminds of a debate long ago at a nonprofit organization at which I
worked.  The argument was this -- Is the amount of money saved by
powering off more that the amount of money expended on repairing and
replacing computers and monitors, due to the stress on electronic
components
from constant turning on and off?  (And there was a side debate on
whether constant turning on and off did indeed stress components, or
whether the various chips, capacitors, resistors, diodes, etc., were
engineered to stand up to repeated powerings-on and off.)

The techies within the organization argued both sides and never could
agree among themselves.  At the time people wondered if anyone
had actually carried out an experiment and published the results.  I
could not find any such report.  So the question remained unresolved,
and there were those who vehemently felt that all the powering up
and down was "hard" on the equipment, and those who were just
as vehemently outraged that we would leave hundreds of computers
running during off-hours and expend electrical power for nothing.

Anyone?  Karen?

Joe Schallan
Phoenix

PS.  I wonder if an even greater waste is office lighting -- i.e.,
lights
left on in office rooms no one is using, lights left on in offices after
closing.  If any of you have worked on a project late in an office,
you may have noticed the behavior of the custodial staff -- they go
to the main panel and flip on all the lights throughout the building,
even though they will be cleaning in only one section at a time.
(I believe this is why when you drive by office towers late at night
you see so many floors brightly illuminated.)

_______________________________________________
Publib mailing list
Publib at webjunction.org
http://lists.webjunction.org/mailman/listinfo/publib

_______________________________________________
Publib mailing list
Publib at webjunction.org
http://lists.webjunction.org/mailman/listinfo/publib