[Publib] RE: Ratings for Children's books
Lise Chlebanowski
lchlebanowski at avondale.org
Wed Jul 12 17:20:19 EDT 2006
That's a great description of the ratings system. Thanks for that. I personally find it really disconcerting when parents bring their very small children/infants into a movie theater for an R movie - especially the horror films - I always wonder how those sounds must make small children feel. I had nightmares for months after seeing The Ghost and Mr. Chicken with Don Knots and that wasn't even supposed to be scary! The eerie organ playing was more than my little wimpy psyche could take! But I digress...
Lise Chlebanowski
Avondale AZ
________________________________
From: publib-bounces at webjunction.org on behalf of Kevin Devine
Sent: Wed 7/12/2006 1:12 PM
To: publib at webjunction.org
Subject: Re: [Publib] RE: Ratings for Children's books
Just to lend some credence to these arguments, I present a web page that
explains the MPAA rating system.
http://www.theclyde.net/TheClyde_Ratings.htm
Joshua Neff wrote:
> "Letting minors check out R rated movies I consider to be the equivalent of
> selling them cigarettes or alcohol."
>
> Seriously? A kid watching R-rated movies could develop lung cancer or
> emphysema? Watching R-rated movies could cause impaired motor skills or
> liver failure?
>
> We don't prevent minors from accessing any other materials in our library,
> so why would we treat audio-visual materials any differently?
>
> Now, if you don't want *your* children checking out R-rated movies, there's
> an easy solution: don't let them check out R-rated movies. That's your right
> and responsibility as a parent.
>
> "And while one person may see something as edgier than another person,
> millions of people are going to see the Texas Chainsaw Massacre as edgier
> than a few hundred people. Let's at least acknowledge the obvious and work
> from there."
>
> Sure, I acknowledge that. What that has to do with rating children's books,
> though, is a bit beyond me. Can you name any children's books that are the
> equivalent of "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre"?
>
>
> --Joshua M. Neff
> Indian Creek Branch
> Olathe Public Library
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: greg at shush.ws [mailto:greg at shush.ws]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 2:38 PM
> To: Joshua Neff; publib at webjunction.org
> Subject: RE: Ratings for Children's books
>
>
> Letting minors check out R rated movies I consider to be the equivalent of
> selling them cigarettes or alcohol.
>
> And while one person may see something as edgier than another person,
> millions of people are going to see the Texas Chainsaw Massacre as edgier
> than a few hundred people. Let's at least acknowledge the obvious and work
> from there.
>
> Greg
> SHUSH
>
>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Joshua Neff" <jneff at olatheks.org>
>> To: greg at shush.ws, publib at webjunction.org
>> Subject: RE: Ratings for Children's books
>> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:04:48 -0500
>>
>>
>> Wait, I didn't say Vertigo was rated for adults (the quotes were there
>> for a reason), I said the comics were written for and marketed to
>> adults. If librarians are putting them in the YA section, I think that
>> shows a tendency to see comics as "kid stuff." Vertigo comics are
>> "rated" for adults the same way "The Devil Wears Prada" (the book, not the
>>
> movie) is "rated" for adults.
>
>> And if publishers decide to rate children's books, I don't think
>> libraries should be beholden to follow those ratings anymore than they
>> do MPAA ratings. (My library, for example, doesn't distinguish between
>> G, PG and R when it comes to patrons of any age checking videos and
>> DVDs out.) The MPAA and book publishers are commercial entities, which
>> has nothing to do with how libraries organize and rate their materials.
>>
>> The other problem is: what one person sees as "edgier" is not what
>> another person sees as "edgier." As always, I think it falls to a
>> minor's parents or guardians to decide what is and isn't appropriate.
>> Librarians can perform reader's advisory for children and parents, and
>> we can point people towards reviews of books, but I think rating books
>> based on subject matter is problematic in too many ways for libraries to
>>
> successfully implement.
>
>> --Joshua M. Neff
>> Indian Creek Branch
>> Olathe Public Library
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: greg at shush.ws [mailto:greg at shush.ws]
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 1:25 PM
>> To: Joshua Neff; publib at webjunction.org
>> Subject: Re: Ratings for Children's books
>>
>>
>> First I'm glad you said Vertigo was rated for adults. I'm finding a
>> lot of Vertigo books winding up in YA collections where they don't belong.
>>
>> Second, it applies because its an example, an idea. I'm not
>> entirely sure it should be on libraries to rate individual books but
>> it could be libraries that encourage publishers to embrace similar
>> categories to mark certain age groups or edgier material.
>>
>> Greg
>> SHUSH
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Joshua Neff" <jneff at olatheks.org>
>>> To: greg at shush.ws, publib at webjunction.org
>>> Subject: RE: [Publib] Re: Ratings for Children's books
>>> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:05:31 -0500
>>>
>>>
>>> Vertigo Comics are "rated" as mature (that is, for adults) because
>>> they're written for and marketed to adults, not kids. I don't see
>>> how that applies to rating children's lit. How exactly would
>>> libraries rate
>>>
>> children's lit?
>>
>>> Based on what criteria? And would each library rate children's lit
>>> differently? Or would ALA rate it?
>>>
>>>
>>> --Joshua M. Neff
>>> Indian Creek Branch
>>> Olathe Public Library
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: publib-bounces at webjunction.org
>>> [mailto:publib-bounces at webjunction.org]
>>> On Behalf Of greg at shush.ws
>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 12:21 PM
>>> To: publib at webjunction.org
>>> Subject: [Publib] Re: Ratings for Children's books
>>>
>>>
>>> Rating systems aren't very good ways to decide what is 'good' or
>>> 'bad' but considering we do very little to sort Fiction in its
>>> various forms (books, movies, etc.) compared to NonFiction, a rating
>>> system is certainly an easy starting point.
>>>
>>> Rating systems do not have to have negative connotations either.
>>> DC Comics has had the Vertigo imprint for a long time now and its an
>>> easy way to note that certain products are more adult in nature. The
>>> reverse is not much different when we describe certain mysteries as
>>>
>> 'cozies'.
>>
>>> Greg
>>> SHUSH
>>>
>>>
>>>> Message: 19
>>>> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 15:23:29 -0700
>>>> From: Sue Kamm <suekamm at mindspring.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [Publib] Ratings for Children's books
>>>> To: Michele Lauer-Bader <mlauerba at suffolk.lib.ny.us>
>>>> Cc: publib at webjunction.org
>>>> Message-ID: <44B424E1.2010806 at mindspring.com>
>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>>>>
>>>> Your client is doing exactly what she should - decide if material
>>>> is >
>>>>
>>> appropriate for her OWN children. While your children's librarian >
>>> is equipped by education to help a parent decide what's good, it's >
>>> the parent who should make the final decision.
>>>
>>>> Rating systems - whether they be for movies, videos, games, or
>>>> books > -
>>>>
>>> are not the best way to choose what's "good" or "bad." What are >
>>> the criteria for the rating, and whose criteria are they? It's not
>>>
>>>> likely to be a government agency, but a private organization of
>>>>
>>> some > kind whose motives in issuing the ratings may not be with
>>> children's > or parents'
>>>
>>>> best interests at heart. Such private organizations (the Motion >
>>>> Picture
>>>>
>>> Producers' Association of America [MPAA] is one example) are >
>>> concerned with the wallets and well-being of their members.
>>>
>>>> Michele Lauer-Bader wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I was recently asked about ratings on children's books.
>>>>> I > > >
>>>>>
>>>> thought I remembered something in the news about this fairly > >
>>>>
> recently.
>
>>> Can anyone help me out.
>>>
>>>>> The question I was asked was from a parent who says she
>>>>> is > > >
>>>>>
>>> often
>>>
>>>> confronted with a situation where her children are interested in
>>>>
>>> books to
>>>
>>>>> read that she is unclear if the content is appropriate for their
>>>>>
> age.
>
>>>> Rather than discourage her children from reading she ends up
>>>> reading > >
>>>>
>>> the book herself to make sure it is age appropriate. She believes >
>>>
>>>> that the publishing industry could benefit from a rating system >
>>>>
>>> that > would help guide parents and children in selecting the most >
>>> age appropriate reading material.
>>>
>>>>> She would like some assistance in how to help reach this goal.
>>>>> I am not particularly in favor of such a rating system.
>>>>> I > > >
>>>>>
>>> know
>>>
>>>> libraries often mark children's books with grade level >
>>>> suggestions > and
>>>>
>>> children's librarians personally assist patrons in > finding >
>>> age-appropriate materials (I was a children's librarian > myself in
>>> a
>>>
>> life long ago).
>>
>>>> However I would just like to point the > patron in the right >
>>>> direction
>>>>
>>> for her specific question.
>>>
>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Michele (Shelley) Lauer-Bader
>>>>> Director, Half Hollow Hills Community Library
>>>>> 55 Vanderbilt Parkway, Dix Hills, NY 11746-5897
>>>>> (voice) 631-421-4530, ext. 1-49, (fax) 631-423-8946
>>>>> (email) mlauerba at suffolk.lib.ny.us
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Publib mailing list
>>>>> Publib at webjunction.org
>>>>> http://lists.webjunction.org/mailman/listinfo/publib
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Your friendly CyberGoddess and ALA Councilor-at-Large, Sue Kamm >
>>>>
>>> Inglewood/Los Angeles, CA Truest of the Blue, Los Angeles Dodgers >
>>> Think Blue Week 2000
>>>
>>>> email: suekamm[at]mindspring.com
>>>> Visit my web page: http://suekamm.home.mindspring.com/index.htm
>>>> When you absolutely, positively HAVE to know, ASK A LIBRARIAN!
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Publib mailing list
>>> Publib at webjunction.org
>>> http://lists.webjunction.org/mailman/listinfo/publib
>>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Publib mailing list
> Publib at webjunction.org
> http://lists.webjunction.org/mailman/listinfo/publib
>
_______________________________________________
Publib mailing list
Publib at webjunction.org
http://lists.webjunction.org/mailman/listinfo/publib
More information about the Publib
mailing list