[ILL-L] RE: Reasons for no - On Reserve

[Laura Barnard]

Greta,

We are a public library and don't have items 'on reserve'.   However, we would consider 'in use' as an appropriate response for an item in this status.

For us as borrowers, whether it is held in reserve for your patrons or is checked out to one of your patron, the item is not available to us.


Laura Barnard
Interlibrary  Loans
Seattle Public Library (UOK)
laura.barnard at spl.org
206-386-4601



From: ill-l-bounces at webjunction.org [mailto:ill-l-bounces at webjunction.org] On Behalf Of Hiebert, Greta
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 12:59 PM
To: 'Interlibrary Loan Listserv'
Subject: [ILL-L] Reasons for no - On Reserve

Maybe this gripe has already been shared, but lately I've been annoyed by the disappearance of "on reserve" as a Reason for No. Does anybody know the rationale for taking it away? None of the existing options really communicates the reason I can't send the item, but I've been using "in use on loan" just because I hate to use "other." What are other folks doing in this situation?

Greta Hiebert
Interlibrary Loan                            interlib at bethelks.edu<mailto:interlib at bethelks.edu>
Bethel College Library                   ph:316.284.5303
300 East 27th Street                     fax:316.284.5843
North Newton KS  67117               OCLC: KSB

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.webjunction.org/wjlists/ill-l/attachments/20090115/bc05776a/attachment.htm