[ILL-L] ILL - To reply Policy Problem, or not?

[Susan M. Lee]

I would like to second that.   We just started getting PromptCat records this months and I've already had several requests for these items that haven't yet even been processed and put on the shelf.
 
Susan Lee
Information Services Librarian
University of Great Falls Library
Great Falls MT 59405
 
slee at ugf.edu

________________________________

From: ill-l-bounces at webjunction.org on behalf of FFenske at cob.org
Sent: Mon 10/1/2007 12:41 PM
To: ill-l at webjunction.org
Subject: [ILL-L] ILL - To reply Policy Problem, or not?


ived


I was wondering how everyone else replies to a request for a New item, that
will come off New status in a year, and would be available to circulate?
Our ILL policy, at BLP, says that we do not loan New items, so the logical
reply is Policy Problem.  I would like to see a new reason added to the
list, "Too New To Lend." This new reason, to me, would indicate that at a
later time a new request could be made on that item when it is no longer
New.

What do you folks think?

Fay Fenske
Bellingham Public Library
210 Central Ave
CS-9710
Bellingham WA  98227-9710

_______________________________________________
ILL-L mailing list
ILL-L at webjunction.org
http://lists.webjunction.org/mailman/listinfo/ill-l


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 4487 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.webjunction.org/wjlists/ill-l/attachments/20071001/71519904/attachment.bin