[ILL-L] ILL - To reply Policy Problem, or not?

[Diane Wiedemann]

I think "Too new to lend" is excellent.  I'm not comfortable with Policy Problem but it's what I use.  Maybe somebody from OCLC is watching?
 
Diane Wiedemann
Document Delivery Specialist
HACC Central Pennsylvania's Community College
717-780-2623   
OCLC - HAC

>>> "Melissa Jackson" <Melissa.Jackson at armstrong.edu> 10/1/2007 3:34 PM >>>

We used to send conditionals in this situation, but too many libraries didn't seem to read them.  Now we reply "Policy Problem" and let it go.  A reason labeled 'Too new' would be nice, but I don't think it's going to happen in OCLC.

Hope this helps!

Melissa Jackson
ILL Librarian


>>> 
From:     <FFenske at cob.org>
To:    <ill-l at webjunction.org>
Date:     10/1/2007 3:01 PM
Subject:     [ILL-L] ILL - To reply Policy Problem, or not?


I was wondering how everyone else replies to a request for a New item, that
will come off New status in a year, and would be available to circulate?
Our ILL policy, at BLP, says that we do not loan New items, so the logical
reply is Policy Problem.  I would like to see a new reason added to the
list, "Too New To Lend." This new reason, to me, would indicate that at a
later time a new request could be made on that item when it is no longer
New.

What do you folks think?

Fay Fenske
Bellingham Public Library
210 Central Ave
CS-9710
Bellingham WA  98227-9710



_______________________________________________
ILL-L mailing list
ILL-L at webjunction.org
http://lists.webjunction.org/mailman/listinfo/ill-l


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.webjunction.org/wjlists/ill-l/attachments/20071001/2ca5c940/attachment.htm