[ILL-L] lacking or not owned?

[Laura Barnard]

My understanding has been that 'lacking' is used for issues not held, missing, lost, etc, and 'not owned' is used to refer to the periodical title itself, as in this run or title has been discarded (but the OCLC catalog  has not yet been updated to reflect that fact.

Laura Barnard
Interlibrary Loans
Seattle Public Library (UOK)
206-386-4601
ill at spl.org

>>> "Document Delivery" <DocDelivery at iona.edu> 11/27/2007 11:38 AM >>>
I've been using 'lacking' for issues of articles we should have but
which are not on the shelf, and 'not owned' for issues of articles we're
not on record as owning, is this the general practice? Thanks, Ed.
 

Edward Helmrich 
ILL Office 
Ryan Library 
Iona College VXI 
914-633-2352 
docdelivery at iona.edu